Paper detail

$Ab~initio$ study of Li-Mg-B superconductors

LiB, a predicted layered compound analogous to the MgB$_2$ superconductor, has been recently synthesized via cold compression and quenched to ambient pressure, yet its superconducting properties have not been measured. According to prior isotropic superconductivity calculations, the critical temperature ($T_{\rm{c}}$) was expected to be only 10$-$15 K. Using the anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg formalism, we show that the $T_{\rm{c}}$ may actually exceed 32 K. Our analysis of the contribution from different electronic states helps explain the detrimental effect of pressure and doping on the compound's superconducting properties. In the search for related superconductors, we screened Li-Mg-B binary and ternary layered materials and found metastable phases with $T_{\rm{c}}$ close to or even 10$-$20% above the record 39 K value in MgB$_2$. Our reexamination of the Li-B binary phase stability reveals a possible route to synthesize the LiB superconductor at lower pressures readily achievable in multianvil cells.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.