Paper detail

Ab initio machine learning of phase space averages

Equilibrium structures determine material properties and biochemical functions. We propose to machine learn phase-space averages, conventionally obtained by {\em ab initio} or force-field based molecular dynamics (MD) or Monte Carlo simulations. In analogy to \textit(ab initio} molecular dynamics (AIMD), our {\em ab initio} machine learning (AIML) model does not require bond topologies and therefore enables a general machine learning pathway to ensemble properties throughout chemical compound space. We demonstrate AIML for predicting Boltzmann averaged structures after training on hundreds of MD trajectories. AIML output is subsequently used to train machine learning models of free energies of solvation using experimental data, and reaching competitive prediction errors (MAE $\sim$ 0.8 kcal/mol) for out-of-sample molecules -- within milli-seconds. As such, AIML effectively bypasses the need for MD or MC-based phase space sampling, enabling exploration campaigns throughout CCS at a much accelerated pace. We contextualize our findings by comparison to state-of-the-art methods resulting in a Pareto plot for the free energy of solvation predictions in terms of accuracy and time.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.