Paper detail

Ab Initio Cosmological Simulations of CR7 as an Active Black Hole

We present the first ab initio cosmological simulations of a CR7-like object which approximately reproduce the observed line widths and strengths. In our model, CR7 is powered by a massive ($3.23 \times 10^7$ $M_\odot$) black hole (BH) the accretion rate of which varies between $\simeq$ 0.25 and $\simeq$ 0.9 times the Eddington rate on timescales as short as 10$^3$ yr. Our model takes into account multi-dimensional effects, X-ray feedback, secondary ionizations and primordial chemistry. We estimate Ly-$α$ line widths by post-processing simulation output with Monte Carlo radiative transfer and calculate emissivity contributions from radiative recombination and collisional excitation. We find the luminosities in the Lyman-$α$ and He II 1640 angstrom lines to be $5.0\times10^{44}$ and $2.4\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$, respectively, in agreement with the observed values of $>$ $8.3\times10^{43}$ and $2.0\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$. We also find that the black hole heats the halo and renders it unable to produce stars as required to keep the halo metal free. These results demonstrate the viability of the BH hypothesis for CR7 in a cosmological context. Assuming the BH mass and accretion rate that we find, we estimate the synchrotron luminosity of CR7 to be $P \simeq 10^{40} - 10^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$, which is sufficiently luminous to be observed in $μ$Jy observations and would discriminate this scenario from one where the luminosity is driven by Population III stars.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.