Paper detail

A Weighted Population Update Rule for PACO Applied to the Single Machine Total Weighted Tardiness Problem

In this paper a new population update rule for population based ant colony optimization (PACO) is proposed. PACO is a well known alternative to the standard ant colony optimization algorithm. The new update rule allows to weight different parts of the solutions. PACO with the new update rule is evaluated for the example of the single machine total weighted tardiness problem (SMTWTP). This is an $\mathcal{NP}$-hard optimization problem where the aim is to schedule jobs on a single machine such that their total weighted tardiness is minimized. PACO with the new population update rule is evaluated with several benchmark instances from the OR-Library. Moreover, the impact of the weights of the jobs on the solutions in the population and on the convergence of the algorithm are analyzed experimentally. The results show that PACO with the new update rule has on average better solution quality than PACO with the standard update rule.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.