Paper detail

A Wearables-Driven Attack on Examination Proctoring

Multiple choice questions are at the heart of many standardized tests and examinations at academic institutions allover the world. In this paper, we argue that recent advancements in sensing and human-computer interaction expose these types of questions to highly effective attacks that today's proctor's are simply not equipped to detect. We design one such attack based on a protocol of carefully orchestrated wrist movements combined with haptic and visual feedback mechanisms designed for stealthiness. The attack is done through collaboration between a knowledgeable student (i.e., a mercenary) and a weak student (i.e., the beneficiary) who depends on the mercenary for solutions. Through a combination of experiments and theoretical modeling, we show the attack to be highly effective. The paper makes the case for an outright ban on all tech gadgets inside examination rooms, irrespective of whether their usage appears benign to the plain eye.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.