Paper detail

A weak type (1,1) inequality for maximal averages over certain sparse sequences

Examples are constructed of sparse subsequences of the integers for which the associated maximal averages operator is of weak type (1,1). A consequence, by transference, is that an almost everywhere L^1 -- type ergodic theorem holds for corresponding subsequences of iterates of general measure-preserving transformations. These examples can be constructed so that n_k has growth rate k^m for any prescribed integer power m greater than or equal to 2. Urban and Zienkiewicz have established the same conclusion for other subsequences, which have growth rate k^m for noninteger exponents m sufficiently close to 1; the first novelty here is that the exponent can be arbitrarily large. In contrast, Buczolich and Mauldin have shown that the corresponding conclusion fails to hold if n_k is exactly k^2. The rather simple analysis relies on certain exponential sum bounds of Weil, together with a decomposition of Calderon-Zygmund type in which the exceptional set is defined in terms of the subsequence in question. The subsequences used are closely related to those employed by Rudin in a 1960 paper in which examples of Lambda(p) sets were constructed.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.