Paper detail

A Volume-Limited Photometric Survey of 114 gamma Doradus Candidates

We have carried out a photometric survey of a complete, volume-limited sample of gamma Doradus candidates. The sample was extracted from the Hipparcos catalog and consists of 114 stars with colors and absolute magnitudes within the range of known gamma Doradus stars. We devoted one year of observing time with our T12 0.8 m automatic photometric telescope to acquire nightly observations of the complete sample of stars. From these survey observations, we identify 37 stars with intrinsic variability of 0.002 mag or more. Of these 37 variables, eight have already been confirmed as gamma Doradus stars in our earlier papers; we scheduled the remaining 29 variables on our T3 0.4 m automatic telescope to acquire more intensive observations over the next two years. We obtained complementary spectroscopic observations with the Kitt Peak coude feed telescope. Analysis of our new photometric and spectroscopic data reveals 15 new gamma Doradus variables (and confirms two others), eight new delta Scuti variables (and confirms one other), and three new variables with unresolved periodicity. Of the 114 gamma Doradus candidates in our volume-limited sample, we find 25 stars that are new or previously-known gamma Doradus variables. This results in an incidence of 22% for gamma Doradus variability among candidate field stars for this volume of the solar neighborhood. The corresponding space density of gamma Doradus stars is 0.094 stars per 10^3 pc^3 or 94 stars per 10^6 pc^3. We provide an updated list of 86 bright, confirmed, gamma Doradus field stars.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.