Paper detail

A VLT/FLAMES survey for massive binaries in Westerlund 1: VII. Cluster census

The formation, properties, and evolution of massive stars remain subject to considerable uncertainty; impacting on fields as diverse as galactic feedback and the nature of the progenitors of both electromagnetic and gravitational wave transients. The clusters many such stars reside within provide a unique laboratory for addressing these issues, and in this work we provide a comprehensive stellar census of Westerlund 1 to underpin such efforts. 69 new members were identified via I-band spectroscopy, yielding a total cluster population of 166 stars with initial masses of ~25Msun to ~50Msun, with more massive stars already lost to supernova. The stellar population follows a smooth and continuous morphological sequence from late-O giant through to OB supergiant. Subsequently, the progression bifurcates, with one branch yielding mid- to late-B hypergiants and cool super-/hypergiants, and the other massive blue stragglers, prior to a diverse population of H-depleted Wolf-Rayets. A substantial population of O-type stars with anomalously broad Paschen series lines are seen, a property which we attribute to binarity. Binary interaction is clearly required to yield the uniquely rich cohort of hypergiants, which includes both mass-stripped primaries and rejuvenated secondaries/stellar mergers. As a consequence future observations of Wd1 and similar stellar aggregates hold out the prospect of characterising both single- and binary- evolutionary channels for massive stars and determining their relative contributions. This in turn will permit the physical properties of such objects at the point of core-collapse to be predicted; of direct relevance for understanding the formation of relativistic remnants such as the magnetars associated with Wd1 and other young massive clusters (Abridged).

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.