Paper detail

A view on elliptic integrals from primitive forms (Period integrals of type $\mathrm{A_2, B_2}$ and $\mathrm{G_2}$

Elliptic integrals, since Euler's finding of addition theorem 1751, has been studied extensively from various view points. Present paper gives a view point from primitive integrals of types $\mathrm{A_2}, \mathrm{B_2}$ and $\mathrm{G_2}$ for the three families of elliptic curves of Weierstrass, Jacobi-Legendre and Hesse, respectively. We solve Jacobi inversion problem for the period maps in the sense explained in the introduction (see [Siegel] Chap.1,13) by introducing certain generalized Eisenstein series of types $\mathrm{A_2}, \mathrm{B_2}$ and $\mathrm{\mathrm{G_2}}$, which generate the ring of invariant functions on the period domain for the congruence subgroups $Γ_1(N)$ ($N=1,2$ and $3$). In particular, Eisenstein series of type $\mathrm{B_2}$ includes the case of weight two, and Eisenstein series of type $\mathrm{G_2}$ includes the cases of weight one and two, which seem to be of new feature. The goal of the paper is a partial answer to the discriminant conjecture, which claims an existence of certain cusp form of weight 1 with character of topological origin, giving a power root of the discriminant form (Aspects Math., E36,p.\ 265-320.\ 2004). See \S12 Concluding Remarks for more about back grounds of the present paper.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.