Paper detail

A vector bundle approach to Nash equilibria

We use vector bundles to study the locus of totally mixed Nash equilibria of an $n$-player game in normal form, which we call the Nash equilibrium scheme. When the payoff tensor format is balanced, we study the Nash discriminant variety, i.e., the algebraic variety of games whose Nash equilibrium scheme is nonreduced or has a positive dimensional component. We prove that this variety has codimension one. We classify all possible components of the Nash equilibrium scheme for a binary three-player game. We prove that if the payoff tensor is of boundary format, then the Nash discriminant variety has two components: an irreducible hypersurface and a larger-codimensional component. A generic game with an unbalanced payoff tensor format does not admit totally mixed Nash equilibria. We define the Nash resultant variety of games admitting a positive number of totally mixed Nash equilibria. We prove that it is irreducible and determine its codimension and degree.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.