Paper detail

A Variant Stellar-to-nebular Dust Attenuation Ratio on Subgalactic and Galactic Scales

The state-of-the-art geometry models of stars/dust suggest that dust attenuation toward nebular regions ($A_{V,gas}$) is always larger than that of stellar regions ($A_{V,star}$). Utilizing the newly released integral field spectroscopic data from the MaNGA survey, we investigate whether and how the $A_{V,star}/A_{V,gas}$ ratio varies from subgalactic to galactic scales. On a subgalactic scale, we report a stronger correlation between $A_{V,star}$ and $A_{V,gas}$ for more active HII regions. The local $A_{V,star}/A_{V,gas}$ is found to have moderate nonlinear correlations with three tracers of diffuse ionized gas (DIG), as well as indicators of gas-phase metallicity and ionization. The DIG regions tend to have larger $A_{V,star}/A_{V,gas}$ compared to classic HII regions excited by young OB stars. Metal-poor regions with a higher ionized level suffer much less nebular attenuation and thus have larger $A_{V,star}/A_{V,gas}$ ratios. A low-$A_{V,gas}$ and high-$A_{V,star}/A_{V,gas}$ sequence, which can be resolved into DIG-dominated and metal-poor regions, on the three BPT diagrams is found. Based on these observations, we suggest that besides the geometry of stars/dust, local physical conditions such as metallicity and ionized level also play an important role in determining the $A_{V,star}/A_{V,gas}$. On a galactic scale, the global $A_{V,star}/A_{V,gas}$ ratio has strong correlations with stellar mass ($M_*$), moderate correlations with SFR and metallicity, and weak correlations with inclination and specific SFR. Galaxies with larger $M_*$ and higher SFR that are more metal-rich tend to have smaller $A_{V,star}/A_{V,gas}$ ratios. Such correlations form a decreasing trend of $A_{V,star}/A_{V,gas}$ along the star-forming main sequence and mass-metallicity relation. The dust growth process accompanied by galaxy growth might be one plausible explanation for our observations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.