Paper detail

A Variable Vector Length SIMD Architecture for HW/SW Co-designed Processors

Hardware/Software (HW/SW) co-designed processors provide a promising solution to the power and complexity problems of the modern microprocessors by keeping their hardware simple. Moreover, they employ several runtime optimizations to improve the performance. One of the most potent optimizations, vectorization, has been utilized by modern microprocessors, to exploit the data level parallelism through SIMD accelerators. Due to their hardware simplicity, these accelerators have evolved in terms of width from 64-bit vectors in Intel MMX to 512-bit wide vector units in Intel Xeon Phi and AVX-512. Although SIMD accelerators are simple in terms of hardware design, code generation for them has always been a challenge. Moreover, increasing vector lengths with each new generation add to this complexity. This paper explores the scalability of SIMD accelerators from the code generation point of view. We discover that the SIMD accelerators remain underutilized at higher vector lengths mainly due to: a) reduced dynamic instruction stream coverage for vectorization and b) increase in permutations. Both of these factors can be attributed to the rigidness of the SIMD architecture. We propose a novel SIMD architecture that possesses the flexibility needed to support higher vector lengths. Furthermore, we propose Variable Length Vectorization and Selective Writing in a HW/SW co-designed environment to transparently target the flexibility of the proposed architecture. We evaluate our proposals using a set of SPECFP2006 and Physicsbench applications. Our experimental results show an average dynamic instruction reduction of 31% and 40% and an average speed up of 13% and 10% for SPECFP2006 and Physicsbench respectively, for 512-bit vector length, over the scalar baseline code.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.