Paper detail

A Universality-Individuality Integration Model for Dialog Act Classification

Dialog Act (DA) reveals the general intent of the speaker utterance in a conversation. Accurately predicting DAs can greatly facilitate the development of dialog agents. Although researchers have done extensive research on dialog act classification, the feature information of classification has not been fully considered. This paper suggests that word cues, part-of-speech cues and statistical cues can complement each other to improve the basis for recognition. In addition, the different types of the three lead to the diversity of their distribution forms, which hinders the mining of feature information. To solve this problem, we propose a novel model based on universality and individuality strategies, called Universality-Individuality Integration Model (UIIM). UIIM not only deepens the connection between the clues by learning universality, but also utilizes the learning of individuality to capture the characteristics of the clues themselves. Experiments were made over two most popular benchmark data sets SwDA and MRDA for dialogue act classification, and the results show that extracting the universalities and individualities between cues can more fully excavate the hidden information in the utterance, and improve the accuracy of automatic dialogue act recognition.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.