Paper detail

A Universal Probability Assignment for Prediction of Individual Sequences

Is it a good idea to use the frequency of events in the past, as a guide to their frequency in the future (as we all do anyway)? In this paper the question is attacked from the perspective of universal prediction of individual sequences. It is shown that there is a universal sequential probability assignment, such that for a large class loss functions (optimization goals), the predictor minimizing the expected loss under this probability, is a good universal predictor. The proposed probability assignment is based on randomly dithering the empirical frequencies of states in the past, and it is easy to show that randomization is essential. This yields a very simple universal prediction scheme which is similar to Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FPL) and works for a large class of loss functions, as well as a partial justification for using probabilistic assumptions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.