Paper detail

A universal bound on N-point correlations from inflation

Models of inflation in which non-Gaussianity is generated outside the horizon, such as curvaton models, generate distinctive higher-order correlation functions in the CMB and other cosmological observables. Testing for violation of the Suyama-Yamaguchi inequality tauNL >= (6/5 fNL)^2, where fNL and tauNL denote the amplitude of the three-point and four-point functions in certain limits, has been proposed as a way to distinguish qualitative classes of models. This inequality has been proved for a wide range of models, but only weaker versions have been proved in general. In this paper, we give a proof that the Suyama-Yamaguchi inequality is always satisfied. We discuss scenarios in which the inequality may appear to be violated in an experiment such as Planck, and how this apparent violation should be interpreted. We analyze a specific example, the "ungaussiton" model, in which leading-order scaling relations suggest that the Suyama-Yamaguchi inequality is eventually violated, and show that the inequality always holds.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.