Paper detail

A unitary distributed subgradient method for multi-agent optimization with different coupling sources

In this work, we first consider distributed convex constrained optimization problems where the objective function is encoded by multiple local and possibly nonsmooth objectives privately held by a group of agents, and propose a distributed subgradient method with double averaging (abbreviated as ${\rm DSA_2}$) that only requires peer-to-peer communication and local computation to solve the global problem. The algorithmic framework builds on dual methods and dynamic average consensus; the sequence of test points is formed by iteratively minimizing a local dual model of the overall objective where the coefficients, i.e., approximated subgradients of the objective, are supplied by the dynamic average consensus scheme. We theoretically show that ${\rm DSA_2}$ enjoys non-ergodic convergence properties, i.e., the local minimizing sequence itself is convergent, a distinct feature that cannot be found in existing results. Specifically, we establish a convergence rate of $O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}})$ in terms of objective function error. Then, extensions are made to tackle distributed optimization problems with coupled functional constraints by combining ${\rm DSA_2}$ and dual decomposition. This is made possible by Lagrangian relaxation that transforms the coupling in constraints of the primal problem into that in cost functions of the dual, thus allowing us to solve the dual problem via ${\rm DSA_2}$. Both the dual objective error and the quadratic penalty for the coupled constraint are proved to converge at a rate of $O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}})$, and the primal objective error asymptotically vanishes. Numerical experiments and comparisons are conducted to illustrate the advantage of the proposed algorithms and validate our theoretical findings.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.