Paper detail

A Unifying Framework for the Identification of Motor Primitives

A long-standing hypothesis in neuroscience is that the central nervous system accomplishes complex motor behaviors through the combination of a small number of motor primitives. Many studies in the last couples of decades have identified motor primitives at the kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic level, thus supporting modularity at different levels of organization in the motor system. However, these studies relied on heterogeneous definitions of motor primitives and on different algorithms for their identification. Standard unsupervised learning algorithms such as principal component analysis, independent component analysis, and non-negative matrix factorization, or more advanced techniques involving the estimation of temporal delays of the relevant mixture components have been applied. This plurality of algorithms has made difficult to compare and interpret results obtained across different studies. Moreover, how the different definitions of motor primitives relate to each other has never been examined systematically. Here we propose a comprehensive framework for the definition of different types of motor primitives and a single algorithm for their identification. By embedding smoothness priors and specific constraints in the underlying generative model, the algorithm can identify many different types of motor primitives. We assessed the identification performance of the algorithm both on simulated data sets, for which the properties of the primitives and of the corresponding combination parameters were known, and on experimental electromyographic and kinematic data sets, collected from human subjects accomplishing goal-oriented and rhythmic motor tasks. The identification accuracy of the new algorithm was typically equal or better than the accuracy of other unsupervised learning algorithms used previously for the identification of the same types of primitives.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.