Paper detail

A Unifying Framework for Self-consistent Gravitational Lensing and Stellar Dynamics Analyses of Early-Type Galaxies

Gravitational lensing and stellar dynamics are two independent methods, based solely on gravity, to study the mass distributions of galaxies. Both methods suffer from degeneracies, however, that are difficult to break. In this paper, we present a new framework that self-consistently unifies gravitational lensing and stellar dynamics. This approach breaks some of classical degeneracies that have limited their individual usage, in particular in the study of high-redshift galaxies. The methodology is based on the premise that, for any given galaxy potential, the mapping of both the unknown lensed source brightness distribution and the stellar phase-space distribution function on to the photometric and kinematic observables, can be cast as a single set of coupled linear equations. This set of linear equations is solved, maximizing the likelihood penalty function. The evidence penalty function, as derived from Bayesian statistics, subsequently allows the best potential-model parameters to be found and potential-model families, or other model assumptions (e.g. PSF), to be quantitatively ranked. We have implemented a fast algorithm that solves for the maximum-likelihood pixelized lensed source brightness distribution and the two-integral stellar phase-space distribution function f(E, L_z), assuming axisymmetric potentials. To make the method practical, we have devised a new Monte-Carlo approach to Schwarzschild's orbital superposition method, based on the superposition of two-integral (E and L_z) toroidal components, to find the maximum-likelihood two-integral distribution function in a matter of seconds in any axisymmetric potential. The non-linear parameters of the potential are subsequently found through a hybrid MCMC and Simplex optimization of the evidence. (Abridged)

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.