Paper detail

A uniform stellar origin for binary black holes revealed by lensing

Although most gravitational wave events are claimed to be mergers of unusually massive, $25-65M_\odot$, black holes, it is now clear that 20\% of all reported events comprise modest mass black holes, $5-15M_\odot$, like the stellar black holes in the Milky Way. We show that such stellar mass black hole binaries (BBH) if magnified by lensing galaxies can be detected at high redshift, 1$< $z$ <$5, with chirp masses increased by $1+z$, accounting for the majority of apparently high mass BBH events. This simple lensing explanation is manifested by the evident bimodality of BBH chirp masses now visible, with 80\% of BBH events in a broad peak centered on $m_{chirp} \simeq 35M_\odot$, and 20\% of BBH events in a narrow, low mass peak at $m_{chirp} \simeq 8.5M_\odot$, matching well our prediction for lensed and unlensed events respectively. This lensing interpretation is reinforced by the &#34;graveyard plot&#34; when ranked by chirp mass, revealing a jump in chirp mass at $m_{chirp} \simeq 10M_\odot$ that we show is caused by the large redshift difference between unlensed events with $z<0.3$ and lensed events above $z>1$. Furthermore, nearly all BBH events are seen to share a component mass ratio of $m_1/m_2=1.45\pm0.03$, indicating a common stellar origin for BBH events across all chirp masses. This observed component mass uniformity implies most binary black holes seldom pair up by random capture, instead we may conclude that massive progenitor stars of BBH black holes typically formed in-situ, in a well defined way over the full span of cosmic time accessed through gravitational lensing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.