Paper detail

A Uniform Search for Secondary Eclipses of Hot Jupiters in Kepler Q2 Lightcurves

We present the results of searching the Kepler Q2 public dataset for the secondary eclipses of 76 hot Jupiter planet candidates from the list of 1,235 candidates published by Borucki et al. (2011). This search has been performed by modeling both the Kepler PDC light curves and new light curves produced via our own photometric pipeline. We derive new stellar and planetary parameters for each system with robust errors. We find 16 systems with 1-2 sigma, 14 systems with 2-3 sigma, and 6 systems with >3 sigma confidence level secondary eclipse detections in at least one light curve. We find that the majority of detected planet candidates emit more light than expected due to thermal blackbody emission in the optical Kepler bandpass, and present a trend of increasing excess emission with decreasing maximum effective planetary temperature. We explore modeling biases, significant planetary albedos, non-LTE or other thermal emission, significant internal energy generation, and exoplanet mis-identification as possible causes of both the excess emission and its correlation with expected planetary temperature. Although we find no single cause is able to explain all of the planet candidates, significant planetary albedos, with a general trend of increasing planetary albedos with decreasing atmospheric temperatures, is able to explain most of the systems. We estimate an 11% false positive rate in the current Kepler planet candidate sample of hot Jupiters. We also establish robust upper limits on the eclipse depth for all systems, and find that a significant fraction of these systems have very low albedos, significantly augmenting and extending the sample of albedo determinations to planets as cool as 1200 K. Finally, we note that continued observations with Kepler, and improved techniques for the removal of systematic noise in the Kepler data, are needed to better characterize these systems.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.