Paper detail

A Unified Mathematical Language for Medicine and Science

A unified mathematical language for medicine and science will be presented. Using this language, models for DNA replication, protein synthesis, chemical reactions, neurons and a cardiac cycle of a heart have been built. Models for Turing machines, cellular automaton, fractals and physical systems are also represented with the use of this language. Interestingly, the language comes with a way to represent probability theory concepts and also programming statements. With this language, questions and processes in medicine can be represented as systems of equations; and solutions to these equations are viewed as treatments or previously unknown processes. This language can serve as the framework for the creation of a large interactive open-access scientific database that allows extensive mathematical medicine computations. It can also serve as a basis for exploring ideas related to what could be called metascience.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.