Paper detail

A UBV Photometric Survey of the Kepler Field

We present the motivations for and methods we used to create a new ground-based photometric survey of the field targeted by the NASA Kepler Mission. The survey contains magnitudes for 4414002 sources in one or more of the UBV filters, including 1862902 sources detected in all three filters. The typical completeness limit is U~18.7, B~19.3, and V~19.1 magnitudes, but varies by location. The area covered is 191 square degrees and includes the areas on and between the 42 Kepler CCDs as well as additional areas around the perimeter of the Kepler field. The major significance of this survey is our addition of U to the optical bandpass coverage available in the Kepler Input Catalog, which was primarily limited to the redder SDSS griz and D51 filters. The U coverage reveals a sample of the hottest sources in the field, many of which are not currently targeted by Kepler, but may be objects of astrophysical interest.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.