Paper detail

A Two-Zone Model for Type I X-ray Bursts on Accreting Neutron Stars

We construct a two-zone model to describe H and He burning on the surface of an accreting neutron star and use it to study the triggering of type I X-ray bursts. Although highly simplified, the model reproduces all of the bursting regimes seen in the more complete global linear stability analysis of Narayan & Heyl (2003), including the regime of delayed mixed bursts. The results are also consistent with observations of type I X-ray bursts. At accretion rates Mdot < 0.1 Mdot_Edd, thermonuclear He burning via the well-known thin-shell thermal instability triggers bursts. As Mdot increases, however, the trigger mechanism evolves from the fast thermal instability to a slowly growing overstability involving both H and He burning. The competition between nuclear heating via the beta-limited CNO cycle and the triple-alpha process on the one hand, and radiative cooling via photon diffusion and emission on the other hand, drives oscillations with a period approximately equal to the H-burning timescale. If these oscillations grow, the gradually rising temperature at the base of the helium layer eventually provokes a thin-shell thermal instability and hence a delayed mixed burst. For Mdot > 0.25 Mdot_Edd, there is no instability or overstability, and there are no bursts. Nearly all other theoretical models predict that bursts should occur for all Mdot < Mdot_Edd, in conflict with both our results and observations. We suggest that this discrepancy arises from the assumed strength of the hot CNO cycle breakout reaction 15O(alpha,gamma)19Ne in these other models. That observations agree much better with the results of Narayan & Heyl and our two-zone model, both of which neglect breakout reactions, may imply that the true 15O(alpha,gamma)19Ne cross section is much smaller than assumed in previous investigations.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.