Paper detail

A two-component model for identified-hadron $\bf p_t$ spectra from 5 TeV p-Pb collisions

In preparation for the heavy ion program at the relativistic heavy ion collider (RHIC) $d$-Au collisions were designated as a control experiment for possible discovery of a quark-gluon plasma (QGP) in more-central Au-Au collisions, and contrasting results from the two systems seemed to support such a discovery. In contrast, recent results ($p_t$-spectrum and angular-correlation features) from $p$-Pb collisions at the large hadron collider (LHC) have been interpreted to support claims of hydrodynamic flows and QGP formation even in small collision systems. The present study addresses such claims via a two-component (soft + hard) model (TCM) of identified-hadron (PID) $p_t$ spectra from 5 TeV $p$-Pb collisions. $p$-Pb centrality is adopted from a previous study of ensemble-mean $\bar p_t$ data from the same system. $p$-Pb $p_t$ spectra for pions, kaons, protons and Lambdas are described by the TCM within their point-to-point uncertainties. Invariance of the TCM hard component vs $p$-Pb centrality indicates that jet formation remains unchanged in $p$-Pb collisions relative to $p$-$p$ collisions, and radial-flow contributions to spectra are negligible. These $p$-Pb TCM results have implications for interpretation of similar data features from A-A collisions in terms of QGP formation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.