Paper detail

A toy model for brain criticality: self-organized excitation/inhibition ratio and the role of network clustering

The critical brain hypothesis receives increasing support from recent experimental results. It postulates that the brain is at a critical point between an ordered and a chaotic regime, sometimes referred to as the "edge of chaos." Another central observation of neuroscience is the principle of excitation-inhibition balance: Certain brain networks exhibit a remarkably constant ratio between excitation and inhibition. When this balance is perturbed, the network shifts away from the critical point, as may for example happen during epileptic seizures. However, it is as of yet unclear what mechanisms balance the neural dynamics towards this excitation-inhibition ratio that ensures critical brain dynamics. Here we introduce a simple yet biologically plausible toy model of a self-organized critical neural network with a self-organizing excitation to inhibition ratio. The model only requires a neuron to have local information of its own recent activity and changes connections between neurons accordingly. We find that the network evolves to a state characterized by avalanche distributions following universal scaling laws typical of criticality, and to a specific excitation to inhibition ratio. The model connects the two questions of brain criticality and of a specific excitation/inhibition balance observed in the brain to a common origin or mechanism. From the perspective of the statistical mechanics of such networks, the model uses the excitation/inhibition ratio as control parameter of a phase transition, which enables criticality at arbitrary high connectivities. We find that network clustering plays a crucial role for this phase transition to occur.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.