A tightness criterion for homology manifolds with or without boundary

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

A simplicial complex XX is said to be tight with respect to a field F\mathbb{F} if XX is connected and, for every induced subcomplex YY of XX, the linear map H∗(Y;F)→H∗(X;F)H_\ast (Y; \mathbb{F}) \rightarrow H_\ast (X; \mathbb{F}) (induced by the inclusion map) is injective. This notion was introduced by Kühnel in [10]. In this paper we prove the following two combinatorial criteria for tightness. (a) Any (k+1)(k+1)-neighbourly kk-stacked F\mathbb{F}-homology manifold with boundary is F\mathbb{F}-tight. Also, (b) any F\mathbb{F}-orientable (k+1)(k+1)-neighbourly kk-stacked F\mathbb{F}-homology manifold without boundary is F\mathbb{F}-tight, at least if its dimension is not equal to 2k+12k+1. The result (a) appears to be the first criterion to be found for tightness of (homology) manifolds with boundary. Since every (k+1)(k+1)-neighbourly kk-stacked manifold without boundary is, by definition, the boundary of a (k+1)(k+1)-neighbourly kk-stacked manifold with boundary - and since we now know several examples (including two infinite families) of triangulations from the former class - theorem (a) provides us with many examples of tight triangulated manifolds with boundary. The second result (b) generalizes a similar result from [2] which was proved for a class of combinatorial manifolds without boundary. We believe that theorem (b) is valid for dimension 2k+12k+1 as well. Except for this lacuna, this result answers a recent question of Effenberger [8] affirmatively.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.