Paper detail

A tightness criterion for homology manifolds with or without boundary

A simplicial complex $X$ is said to be tight with respect to a field $\mathbb{F}$ if $X$ is connected and, for every induced subcomplex $Y$ of $X$, the linear map $H_\ast (Y; \mathbb{F}) \rightarrow H_\ast (X; \mathbb{F})$ (induced by the inclusion map) is injective. This notion was introduced by Kühnel in [10]. In this paper we prove the following two combinatorial criteria for tightness. (a) Any $(k+1)$-neighbourly $k$-stacked $\mathbb{F}$-homology manifold with boundary is $\mathbb{F}$-tight. Also, (b) any $\mathbb{F}$-orientable $(k+1)$-neighbourly $k$-stacked $\mathbb{F}$-homology manifold without boundary is $\mathbb{F}$-tight, at least if its dimension is not equal to $2k+1$. The result (a) appears to be the first criterion to be found for tightness of (homology) manifolds with boundary. Since every $(k+1)$-neighbourly $k$-stacked manifold without boundary is, by definition, the boundary of a $(k+1)$-neighbourly $k$-stacked manifold with boundary - and since we now know several examples (including two infinite families) of triangulations from the former class - theorem (a) provides us with many examples of tight triangulated manifolds with boundary. The second result (b) generalizes a similar result from [2] which was proved for a class of combinatorial manifolds without boundary. We believe that theorem (b) is valid for dimension $2k+1$ as well. Except for this lacuna, this result answers a recent question of Effenberger [8] affirmatively.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.