Paper detail

A Tighter Approximation Guarantee for Greedy Minimum Entropy Coupling

We examine the minimum entropy coupling problem, where one must find the minimum entropy variable that has a given set of distributions $S = \{p_1, \dots, p_m \}$ as its marginals. Although this problem is NP-Hard, previous works have proposed algorithms with varying approximation guarantees. In this paper, we show that the greedy coupling algorithm of [Kocaoglu et al., AAAI&#39;17] is always within $\log_2(e)$ ($\approx 1.44$) bits of the minimum entropy coupling. In doing so, we show that the entropy of the greedy coupling is upper-bounded by $H\left(\bigwedge S \right) + \log_2(e)$. This improves the previously best known approximation guarantee of $2$ bits within the optimal [Li, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory &#39;21]. Moreover, we show our analysis is tight by proving there is no algorithm whose entropy is upper-bounded by $H\left(\bigwedge S \right) + c$ for any constant $c<\log_2(e)$. Additionally, we examine a special class of instances where the greedy coupling algorithm is exactly optimal.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.