Paper detail

A tight Hermite-Hadamard's inequality and a generic method for comparison between residuals of inequalities with convex functions

We present a tight parametrical Hermite-Hadamard type inequality with probability measure, which yields a considerably closer upper bound for the mean value of convex function than the classical one. Our inequality becomes equality not only with affine functions, but also with a family of V-shaped curves determined by the parameter. The residual (error) of this inequality is strictly smaller than in the classical Hermite-Hadamard inequality under any probability measure and with all non-affine convex functions. In the framework of Karamata's theorem on the inequalities with convex functions, we propose a method of measuring a global performance of inequalities in terms of average residuals over functions of the type $x\mapsto |x-u|$. Using average residuals enables comparing two or more inequalities as themselves, with same or different measures and without referring to a particular function. Our method is applicable to all Karamata's type inequalities, with integrals or sums. A numerical experiment with three different measures indicates that the average residual in our inequality is about 4 times smaller than in classical right Hermite-Hadamard, and also is smaller than in Jensen's inequality, with all three measures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.