Paper detail

A threshold for cutoff in two-community random graphs

In this paper, we are interested in the impact of communities on the mixing behavior of the non-backtracking random walk. We consider sequences of sparse random graphs of size $N$ generated according to a variant of the classical configuration model which incorporates a two-community structure. The strength of the bottleneck is measured by a parameter $α$ which roughly corresponds to the fraction of edges that go from one community to the other. We show that if $α\gg \frac{1}{\log N}$, then the non-backtracking random walk exhibits cutoff at the same time as in the one-community case, but with a larger cutoff window, and that the distance profile inside this window converges to the Gaussian tail function. On the other hand, if $α\ll \frac{1}{\log N}$ or $α\asymp \frac{1}{\log N}$, then the mixing time is of order $1/α$ and there is no cutoff.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.