A three term sublevel set inequality

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let BB be a ball in R2{\mathbb R}^2. For j=1,2,3j=1,2,3 let φj:B→R1φ_j:B\to{\mathbb R}^1 be real analytic submersions, and let aja_j be real analytic coefficient functions. To any ε>0\varepsilon>0 and any Lebesgue measurable functions fj:R1→Cf_j:{\mathbb R}^1\to {\mathbb C} associate the sublevel set S=S(f1,f2,f3,ε)={x∈B:∣∑j=13aj(x)(fj∘φj)(x)∣<ε}S = S(f_1,f_2,f_3,\varepsilon) = \{x\in B: |\sum_{j=1}^3 a_j(x)(f_j\circφ_j)(x)|<\varepsilon\}. Let S′={x∈S:max⁡j∣fj∘φj(x)∣≥1}S' = \{x\in S: \max_j|f_j\circφ_j(x)|\ge 1\}. Our main result is an upper bound, under certain hypotheses on the data φj,ajφ_j,a_j for the Lebesgue measure of S′S' of the form ∣S′∣≤cεγ|S'| \le c\varepsilon^γ for some constants c,γ>0c,γ>0 that depend on the data aj,φja_j,φ_j but not on the functions fjf_j or parameter ε\varepsilon. The main hypothesis is that in any connected open subset of BB, the only real analytic solution (f1,f2,f3)(f_1,f_2,f_3) of ∑jaj(x)(fj∘φj)(x)≡0\sum_j a_j(x)(f_j\circφ_j)(x)\equiv 0 is the trivial solution fk=0 ∀ kf_k=0\ \forall\,k. Certain auxiliary hypotheses, which hold for generic φj,ajφ_j,a_j, are also imposed. The case in which all coefficients aja_j are constant was previously known. This result is a principal ingredient in an analysis, in a companion paper, of related implicitly oscillatory integrals with four factors fjf_j. Certain related results are also discussed. In particular, a generalization to arbitrarily many summands f_j is obtained for the special case in which all mappings φjφ_j are linear.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.