Paper detail

A thin shell of ionized gas explaining the IR excess of classical Cepheids

Despite observational evidences, InfraRed (IR) excess of classical Cepheids are seldom studied and poorly understood, but probably induces systematics on the Period-Luminosity (PL) relation used in the calibration of the extragalactic distance scale. This study aims to understand the physical origin of the IR excess found in the spectral energy distribution (SED) of 5 Cepheids : RS Pup (P=41.46d), zeta Gem (P=10.15d), eta Aql (P=7.18d), V Cen (P=5.49d) and SU Cyg (P=3.85d). A time series of atmospheric models along the pulsation cycle are fitted to a compilation of data, including optical and near-IR photometry, Spitzer spectra (secured at a specific phase), interferometric angular diameters, effective temperature and radial velocity measurements. Herschel images in two bands are also analyzed qualitatively. In this fitting process, based on the SPIPS algorithm, a residual is found in the SED, whatever the pulsation phase, and for wavelengths larger than about $1.2μ$m, which corresponds to the so-determined infrared excess of Cepheids. This IR excess is then corrected from interstellar medium absorption in order to infer or not the presence of dust shells, and is finally used in order to fit a model of a shell of ionized gas. For all Cepheids, we find a continuum IR excess increasing up to about -0.1 magnitudes at 30$μ$m, which cannot be explained by a hot or cold dust model of CircumStellar Environment (CSE). We show, for the first time, that the IR excess of Cepheids can be explained by free-free emission from a thin shell of ionized gas, with a thickness of about 15% of the star radius, a mass of $10^{-9}-10^{-7}$ Msol and a temperature ranging from 3500 to 4500K. This result has to be tested with interferometers operating in visible, in the mid-IR or in the radio domain. The impact of such CSEs of ionized gas on the PL relation of Cepheids needs also more investigations.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access15 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.