Paper detail

A Theory of Available-by-Design Communicating Systems

Choreographic programming is a programming-language design approach that drives error-safe protocol development in distributed systems. Starting from a global specification (choreography) one can generate distributed implementations. The advantages of this top-down approach lie in the correctness-by-design principle, where implementations (endpoints) generated from a choreography behave according to the strict control flow described in the choreography, and do not deadlock. Motivated by challenging scenarios in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), we study how choreographic programming can cater for dynamic infrastructures where not all endpoints are always available. We introduce the Global Quality Calculus ($GC_q$), a variant of choreographic programming for the description of communication systems where some of the components involved in a communication might fail. GCq features novel operators for multiparty, partial and collective communications. This paper studies the nature of failure-aware communication: First, we introduce $GC_q$ syntax, semantics and examples of its use. The interplay between failures and collective communications in a choreography can lead to choreographies that cannot progress due to absence of resources. In our second contribution, we provide a type system that ensures that choreographies can be realized despite changing availability conditions. A specification in $GC_q$ guides the implementation of distributed endpoints when paired with global (session) types. Our third contribution provides an endpoint-projection based methodology for the generation of failure-aware distributed processes. We show the correctness of the projection, and that well-typed choreographies with availability considerations enjoy progress.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.