Paper detail

A Theoretical Study of Acoustic Glitches in Low-Mass Main-Sequence Stars

There are regions in stars, such as ionization zones and the interface between radiative and convective regions, that cause a localized sharp variation in the sound speed. These are known as "acoustic glitches". Acoustic glitches leave their signatures on the oscillation frequencies of stars, and hence these signature can be used as diagnostics of these regions. In particular, the signature of these glitches can be used as diagnostics of the position of the second helium ionization zone and that of the base of the envelope convection zone. With the help of stellar models we study the properties of these acoustic glitches in main-sequence stars. We find that the acoustic glitch due to the helium ionization zone does not correspond to the dip in the adiabatic index Γ_1 caused by the ionization of HeII, but to the peak in Γ_1 between the HeI and HeII ionization zones. We find that it is easiest to study the acoustic glitch due to the helium ionization zone in stars with masses in the range 0.9--1.2 M_\odot.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.