Paper detail

A Test of the Collisional Dark Matter Hypothesis from Cluster Lensing

Spergel & Steinhardt proposed the possibility that the dark matter particles are self-interacting, as a solution to two discrepancies between the predictions of cold dark matter models and the observations: first, the observed dark matter distribution in some dwarf galaxies has large, constant-density cores, as opposed to the predicted central cusps; and second, small satellites of normal galaxies are much less abundant than predicted. The dark matter self-interaction would produce isothermal cores in halos, and would also expel the dark matter particles from dwarfs orbiting within large halos. However, another inevitable consequence of the model is that halos should become spherical once most particles have interacted. Here, I rule out this model by the fact that the innermost regions of dark matter halos in massive clusters of galaxies are elliptical, as shown by gravitational lensing and other observations. The absence of collisions in the lensing cores of massive clusters implies that any dark matter self-interaction is too weak to have affected the observed density profiles in the dark-matter dominated dwarf galaxies, or to have eased the destruction of dwarf satellites in galactic halos. If $s_x$ is the cross section and $m_x$ the mass of the dark matter particle, then $s_x/m_x < 10^{-25.5} \cm^2/\gev$.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.