Paper detail

A Test of Star Formation Laws in Disk Galaxies. II. Dependence on dynamical properties

We use observed radial profiles of mass surface densities of total, $Σ_g$, & molecular, $Σ_{\rm H2}$, gas, rotation velocity & star formation rate (SFR) surface density, $Σ_{\rm sfr}$, of the molecular-rich ($Σ_{\rm H2}\geΣ_{\rm HI}/2$) regions of 16 nearby disk galaxies to test several star formation laws: a Kennicutt-Schmidt law, $Σ_{\rm sfr}=A_gΣ_{g,2}^{1.5}$; a Constant Molecular law, $Σ_{\rm sfr}=A_{\rm H2}Σ_{\rm H2,2}$; the turbulence-regulated laws of Krumholz & McKee (KM05) and Krumholz et al. (KMT09), a Gas-$Ω$ law, $Σ_{\rm sfr}=B_ΩΣ_gΩ$; and a shear-driven GMC Collision law, $Σ_{\rm sfr}=B_{\rm CC}Σ_gΩ(1-0.7β)$, where $β\equiv d {\rm ln} v_{\rm circ}/d {\rm ln} r$. If allowed one free normalization parameter for each galaxy, these laws predict the SFR with rms errors of factors of 1.4 - 1.8. If a single normalization parameter is used by each law for the entire galaxy sample, then rms errors range from factors of 1.5 - 2.1. Although the Constant Molecular law gives the smallest errors, the improvement over KMT, Kennicutt-Schmidt & GMC Collision laws is not especially significant, particularly given the different observational inputs that the laws utilize and the scope of included physics, which ranges from empirical relations to detailed treatment of interstellar medium processes. We next search for variation of star formation law parameters with local & global galactic dynamical properties of disk shear rate (related to $β$), rotation speed & presence of a bar. We demonstrate with high significance that higher shear rates enhance star formation efficiency per local orbital time. Such a trend is expected if GMC collisions play an important role in star formation, while an opposite trend would be expected if development of disk gravitational instabilities is the controlling physics.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.