Paper detail

A Test of Star Formation Laws in Disk Galaxies

We use observations of the radial profiles of the mass surface density of total, Sigma_g, and molecular, Sigma_H2, gas, rotation velocity and star formation rate surface density, Sigma_sfr, of the molecular dominated regions of 12 disk galaxies from Leroy et al. to test several star formation laws: a "Kennicutt-Schmidt power law", Sigma_sfr=A_g Sigma_{g,2}^{1.5}$; a "Constant molecular law", Sigma_sfr = A_H2 Sigma_{H2,2}; the "Turbulence-regulated laws" of Krumholz & McKee (KM) and Krumholz, McKee & Tumlinson (KMT), a "Gas-Omega law", Sigma_sfr = B_Omega Sigma_g Omega; and a shear-driven "GMC collisions law", Sigma_sfr = B_CC Sigma_g Omega (1 - 0.7beta), where beta is d ln v_circ / d ln r. We find the constant molecular law, KMT turbulence law and GMC collision law are the most accurate, with an rms error of a factor of 1.5 if the normalization constants are allowed to vary between galaxies. Of these three laws, the GMC collision law does not require a change in physics to account for the full range of star formation activity seen from normal galaxies to circumnuclear starbursts. A single global GMC collision law with B_CC=8.0x10^{-3}, i.e. a gas consumption time of 20 orbital times for beta=0, yields an rms error of a factor of 1.8.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.