Paper detail

A technique to select the most obscured galaxy nuclei

Compact obscured nuclei (CONs) are mainly found in local U/LIRGs. In the local Universe, these sources are generally selected through the detection of the HCN-vib (3-2) emission line at submillimetre wavelengths. In this work, we present a diagnostic method to select deeply buried nuclei based on mid-infrared (mid-IR) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and continuum ratios. Using Spitzer/IRS spectra of a representative sample of local ULIRGs (z<0.27), we examine their PAH and underlying continuum emission ratios. For deeply embedded sources, we find that the 9.7 micron silicate absorption band has a particularly pronounced effect on the 11.3 micron PAH feature. The low flux level in the nuclear silicate absorption band enhances the 11.3 micron PAH feature contrast (high PAH equivalent width) compared to that of the other PAH features. The technique has been extended to include the use of the continuum ratios. However, the latter are affected both by the extinction coming from the host galaxy as well as the nuclear region, whereas the foreground extinction is cancelled out when using the PAH equivalent width ratios. We apply our method to the HERUS and GOALS samples and classify as CON candidates 14 ULIRGs and 10 LIRGs, corresponding to 30% of ULIRGs and 7% of LIRGs from these samples. We find that the observed continuum ratios of CON-dominated sources can be explained by assuming torus models with a tapered disk geometry and a smooth dust distribution. This suggests that the nuclear dusty structure of CONs has an extremely high dust coverage. We also demonstrate that the use of mid-IR color-color diagrams is an effective way to select CON-dominated sources at different redshifts. In particular, the combination of filters of the JWST/MIRI will enable the selection of CONs out to z~1.5. This will allow extending the selection of CONs to high redshifts where U/LIRGs are more numerous.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.