Paper detail

A technique for constraining the driving scale of turbulence and a modified Chandrasekhar-Fermi method

The Chandrasekhar-Fermi method is a powerful technique for estimating the strength of the mean magnetic field projected on the plane of the sky. In this paper, we present a technique for improving the Chandrasekhar-Fermi method, in which we take into account the averaging effect arising from independent eddies along the line of sight . In the conventional Chandrasekhar-Fermi method, the strength of fluctuating magnetic field divided by $\sqrt{4 π\barρ}$, where $\barρ$ is average density, is assumed to be comparable to the line-of-sight velocity dispersion. This however is not true when the driving scale of turbulence $L_f$, i.e. the outer scale of turbulence, is smaller than the size of the system along the line of sight $L_{los}$. In fact, the conventional Chandrasekhar-Fermi method over-estimates the strength of the mean plane-of-the-sky magnetic field by a factor of $\sim \sqrt{ L_{los}/L_f}$. We show that the standard deviation of centroid velocities divided by the average line-of-sight velocity dispersion is a good measure of $\sqrt{ L_{los}/L_f}$, which enables us to propose a modified Chandrasekhar-Fermi method.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.