Paper detail

A tau-leaping method for computing joint probability distributions of the first-passage time and position of a Brownian particle

First passage time (FPT) is the time a particle, subject to some stochastic process, hits or crosses a closed surface for the very first time. $τ$-leaping methods are a class of stochastic algorithms in which, instead of simulating every single reaction, many reactions are ``leaped" over in order to shorten the computing time. In this paper we developed a $τ$-leaping method for computing the FPT and position in arbitrary volumes for a Brownian particle governed by the Langevin equation. The $τ$-leaping method proposed here works as follows. A sphere is inscribed within the volume of interest (VOI) centered at the initial particle's location. On this sphere, the FPT is sampled, as well as the position, which becomes the new initial position. Then, another sphere, centered at this new location, is inscribed. This process continues until the sphere becomes smaller than some minimal radius $R_{\text{min}}$. When this occurs, the $τ$-leaping switches to the conventional Monte Carlo, which runs until the particle either crosses the surface of the VOI or finds its way to a position where a sphere of radius $>R_{\text{min}}$ can be inscribed. The switching between $τ$-leaping and MC continues until the particle crosses the surface of the VOI. The size of this radius depends on the system parameters and on one's notion of accuracy: the larger this radius the more accurate the $τ$-leaping method, but also less efficient. This trade off between accuracy and efficiency is discussed. For two VOI, the $τ$-leaping method is shown to be accurate and more efficient than MC by at least a factor of 10 and up to a factor of about 110. However, while MC becomes exponentially slower with increasing VOI, the efficiency of the $τ$-leaping method remains relatively unchanged. Thus, the $τ$-leaping method can potentially be many orders of magnitude more efficient than MC.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.