Paper detail

A tale of two populations: the stellar mass of central and satellite galaxies

We develop a new empirical methodology to study the relation between the stellar mass of galaxies and the mass of their host subhaloes. Our approach is similar to abundance matching, and is based on assigning a stellar mass to each subhalo within a large cosmological N-body simulation. However, we significantly extend the method to include a different treatment for central and satellite galaxies, allowing the stellar mass of satellite galaxies to depend on both the host subhalo mass, and on the halo mass. Unlike in previous studies, our models are constrained by two observations: the stellar mass function of galaxies, and their auto-correlation functions (CFs). We present results for ~10^6 different successful models, showing that the uncertainty in the host subhalo mass reaches a factor of ~10 for a given stellar mass. Our results thus indicate that the host subhalo mass of central and satellite galaxies is poorly constrained by using information coming solely from the abundance and CFs of galaxies. In addition, we demonstrate that the fraction of stellar mass relative to the universal baryon fraction can vary between different models, and can reach ~0.6 for a specific population of low mass galaxies. We conclude that additional observational constraints are needed, in order to better constrain the mass relation between haloes and galaxies. These might include weak lensing, satellite kinematics, or measures of clustering other than the CFs. Moreover, CFs based on larger surveys with a better estimate of the systematic uncertainties are needed.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.