Paper detail

A systematic study of radiative torque grain alignment in the diffuse interstellar medium

Context. Planck observations demonstrated that the grain alignment efficiency is almost constant in the diffuse ISM. Aims. We test if the Radiative Torque (RAT) theory is compatible with observational constraints on grain alignment. Methods. We combine a numerical simulation with the radiative transfer code POLARIS that incorporates a physical dust model and the detailed grain alignment physics of RATs. A dust model is designed to reproduce the spectral dependence of extinction of the ISM. From a RAMSES simulation of interstellar turbulence, we extract a cube representative of the diffuse ISM. We post-process the cube with POLARIS to get the grain temperature and RATs to simulate synthetic dust polarization maps. Results. In our simulation the grain alignment efficiency is correlated with gas pressure, but not with the RAT intensity. Because of the low dust extinction, the magnitude of RATs varies little, decreasing only for high column densities $N_H$. Comparing our maps with a uniform alignment efficiency, we find no systematic difference. The dependence of polarization fraction $p$ with $N_H$ or polarization dispersion $S$ is similar. The drop of RATs in dense regions barely affects the polarization pattern, the signal being dominated by the LOS and magnetic field geometry. If a star is inserted, the polarization increases, with no specific pattern around the star. The angle-dependence of RATs is not observed in the maps, and is weak using a uniform magnetic field. Conclusions. RATs are compatible with Planck data for the diffuse ISM such that both uniform alignment and RAT alignment lead to similar observations. To further test the predictions of RATs where an important drop of grain alignment is expected, polarization observations of dense regions must be confronted to numerical simulations sampling high column densities through dense clouds, with enough statistics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.