Paper detail

A systematic aging method I: HII regions D118 and D119 in NGC 300

Accurately determining the age of H\,{ii} regions and the stars they host is as important as it is challenging. Historically the most popular method has been isochrone fitting to Hertzsprung-Russell Diagrams or Colour-Magnitude Diagrams. Here we introduce a different method for age determination using BPASS and hoki. We infer the most likely ages of the regions D118 and D119 NGC 300 to be log(age/years)=6.86$^{0.05}_{0.06}$ and we also deduce stellar mass and number counts by comparison with the BPASS models. We compare how our binary and single star models perform and find that the latter are unable to predict 20 per cent ($\pm$ 10 per cent) of our sample. We also discuss how results obtained from isochrone fitting would differ. We conclude that ages could be underestimated by ~0.2 dex and that the limitations of the isochrone method is not solely due to the lack of binary stars. We propose that the method presented here is more reliable and more widely applicable since it can be used on smaller samples. Alongside this study, we release new hoki features to allow easy implementation of this method.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.