Paper detail

A System-Level Framework for Analytical and Empirical Reliability Exploration of STT-MRAM Caches

Spin-Transfer Torque Magnetic RAM (STT-MRAM) is known as the most promising replacement for SRAM technology in large Last-Level Caches (LLCs). Despite its high-density, non-volatility, near-zero leakage power, and immunity to radiation as the major advantages, STT-MRAM-based cache suffers from high error rates mainly due to retention failure, read disturbance, and write failure. Existing studies are limited to estimating the rate of only one or two of these error types for STT-MRAM cache. However, the overall vulnerability of STT-MRAM caches, which its estimation is a must to design cost-efficient reliable caches, has not been offered in any of previous studies. In this paper, we propose a system-level framework for reliability exploration and characterization of errors behavior in STT-MRAM caches. To this end, we formulate the cache vulnerability considering the inter-correlation of the error types including all three errors as well as the dependency of error rates to workloads behavior and Process Variations (PVs). Our analysis reveals that STT-MRAM cache vulnerability is highly workload-dependent and varies by orders of magnitude in different cache access patterns. Our analytical study also shows that this vulnerability divergence significantly increases by process variations in STT-MRAM cells. To evaluate the framework, we implement the error types in the gem5 full-system simulator, and the experimental results show that the total error rate in a shared LLC varies by 32.0x for different workloads. A further 6.5x vulnerability variation is observed when considering PVs in the STT-MRAM cells. In addition, the contribution of each error type in total LLC vulnerability highly varies in different cache access patterns and moreover, error rates are differently affected by PVs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.