Paper detail

A Synthetic Perspective on $(\infty,1)$-Category Theory: Fibrational and Semantic Aspects

Reasoning about weak higher categorical structures constitutes a challenging task, even to the experts. One principal reason is that the language of set theory is not invariant under the weaker notions of equivalence at play, such as homotopy equivalence. From this point of view, it is natural to ask for a different foundational setting which more natively supports these notions. Our work takes up on suggestions in the original article arXiv:1705.07442 by Riehl--Shulman to further develop synthetic $(\infty,1)$-category theory in simplicial homotopy type theory, including in particular the study of cocartesian fibrations. Together with a collection of analytic results, notably due to Riehl--Verity and Rasekh, it follows that our type-theoretic account constitutes a synthetic theory of fibrations of internal $(\infty,1)$-categories, w.r.t. to an arbitrary Grothendieck--Rezk--Lurie-$(\infty,1)$-topos via Shulman's major result arXiv:1904.07004 about strictification of univalent universes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.