Paper detail

A Survey on How Test Flakiness Affects Developers and What Support They Need To Address It

Non-deterministically passing and failing test cases, so-called flaky tests, have recently become a focus area of software engineering research. While this research focus has been met with some enthusiastic endorsement from industry, prior work nevertheless mostly studied flakiness using a code-centric approach by mining software repositories. What data extracted from software repositories cannot tell us, however, is how developers perceive flakiness: How prevalent is test flakiness in developers' daily routine, how does it affect them, and most importantly: What do they want us researchers to do about it? To answer these questions, we surveyed 335 professional software developers and testers in different domains. The survey respondents confirm that flaky tests are a common and serious problem, thus reinforcing ongoing research on flaky test detection. Developers are less worried about the computational costs caused by re-running tests and more about the loss of trust in the test outcomes. Therefore, they would like to have IDE plugins to detect flaky code as well as better visualizations of the problem, particularly dashboards showing test outcomes over time; they also wish for more training and information on flakiness. These important aspects will require the attention of researchers as well as tool developers.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.