Paper detail

A Survey of Weak MgII Absorbers at 0.4 < z < 2.4

We present results from a survey of weak MgII absorbers in the VLT/UVES spectra of 81 QSOs obtained from the ESO archive. In this survey, we identified 112 weak MgII systems within the redshift interval 0.4 < z < 2.4 with 86% completeness down to a rest-frame equivalent width of W_r(2796) = 0.02A, covering a cumulative redshift path length of deltaZ=77.3. From this sample, we estimate that the number of weak absorbers per unit redshift dN/dz increases from 1.06 +/- 0.04 at <z>=1.9 to 1.76 +/- 0.08 at <z>=1.2 and thereafter decreases to 1.51 +/- 0.09 at <z>=0.9 and 1.06 +/- 0.10 at <z>=0.6. Thus we find evidence for an evolution in the population of weak MgII absorbers, with their number density peaking at z=1.2. We also determine the equivalent width distribution of weak systems at <z>=0.9 and <z>=1.9. At 0.4 < z < 1.4, there is evidence for a turnover from a powerlaw of the form n(W_r) \propto W_r^{-1.04} at W_r(2796) < 0.1A. This turnover is more extreme at 1.4 < z < 2.4, where the equivalent width distribution is close to an extrapolation of the exponential distribution function found for strong MgII absorbers. Based on these results, we discuss the possibility that some fraction of weak MgII absorbers, particularly single cloud systems, are related to satellite clouds surrounding strong MgII systems. These structures could also be analogs to Milky Way high velocity clouds. In this context, the paucity of high redshift weak MgII absorbers is caused by a lack of isolated accreting clouds on to galaxies during that epoch.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.