Paper detail

A Survey of Strong Cosmic Censorship Conjecture Beyond Einstein's Gravity

The strong cosmic censorship conjecture (SCCC) proposed by Penrose states that the presence of the inner Cauchy horizon ($\mathcal{CH}$) in the black hole solutions does not threaten the deterministic nature of general relativity since it is actually unstable against the remnant perturbation fields that fall into the black hole. Although this conjecture is well-established for the asymptotically flat spacetimes in general relativity, it is challenged upon taking a small positive cosmological constant as required by observational data. This challenge can be fixed by finding even one type of quasi-normal mode whose decay rate is slow enough insofar as the remnant of perturbation is able to destroy the $\mathcal{CH}$. By aiming to investigate the role of the additional parameter induced by modified gravity in this scenario, we consider the charged-de Sitter black hole solutions of Einstein-Maxwell theory extended with $f(R)$ and Energy-Momentum Squared Gravities. Employing the numerical analysis of the deterministic criterion, we show that the presence of the model parameter of theories at hand within a given range controls the decay rate of the photon sphere quasi-normal modes (in the eikonal limit) to rescue SCCC.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.