Paper detail

A Survey of Merger Remnants II: The Emerging Kinematic and Photometric Correlations

This paper is the second in a series exploring the properties of 51 {\it optically} selected, single-nuclei merger remnants. Spectroscopic data have been obtained for a sub-sample of 38 mergers and combined with previously obtained infrared photometry to test whether mergers exhibit the same correlations as elliptical galaxies among parameters such as stellar luminosity and distribution, central stellar velocity dispersion ($σ$$_{\circ}$), and metallicity. Paramount to the study is to test whether mergers lie on the Fundamental Plane. Measurements of $σ$$_{\circ}$ have been made using the Ca triplet absorption line at 8500 Å for all 38 mergers in the sub-sample. Additional measurements of $σ$$_{\circ}$ were made for two of the mergers in the sub-sample using the CO absorption line at 2.29 $\micron$. The results indicate that mergers show a strong correlation among the parameters of the Fundamental Plane but fail to show a strong correlation between $σ$$_{\circ}$ and metallicity (Mg$_{2}$). In contrast to earlier studies, the $σ$$_{\circ}$ of the mergers are consistent with objects which lie somewhere between intermediate-mass and luminous giant elliptical galaxies. However, the discrepancies with earlier studies appears to correlate with whether the Ca triplet or CO absorption lines are used to derive $σ$$_{\circ}$, with the latter almost always producing smaller values. Finally, the photometric and kinematic data are used to demonstrate for the first time that the central phase-space density of mergers are equivalent to elliptical galaxies. This resolves a long-standing criticism of the merger hypothesis.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.