Paper detail

A Survey of Atomic Carbon at High Redshift

We present a survey of atomic carbon (CI) emission in high-redshift (z>2) submillimeter galaxies (SMGs) and quasar host galaxies (QSOs). Sensitive observations of the CI(3P_1->3P_0) and CI(3P_2->3P_1) lines have been obtained at the IRAM Plateau de Bure interferometer and the IRAM 30m telescope. A total of 16 CI lines have been targeted in 10 sources, leading to a total of 10 detected lines --- this doubles the number of CI observations at high redshift to date. We include previously published CI observations (an additional 5 detected sources) in our analysis. Our main finding is that the CI properties of the studied high-redshift systems do not differ significantly from what is found in low-redshift systems, including the Milky Way. The CI(3P_2->3P_1)/CI(3P_1->3P_0) and the CI(3P_1->3P_0)/12CO(3-2) line luminosity (L') ratios change little in our sample, with respective ratios of 0.55+/-0.15 and 0.32+/-0.13. The CI lines are not an important contributor to cooling of the molecular gas (average L_CI/L_FIR ~ (7.7+/-4.6) x 10^-6). We derive a mean carbon excitation temperature of 29.1+/-6.3 K, broadly consistent with dust temperatures derived for high-redshift starforming systems, but lower than gas temperatures typically derived for starbursts in the local universe. The carbon abundance of X_CI/X_H2~8.4+/-3.5 x 10^-5 is of the same order as found in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. This implies that the high-z galaxies studied here are significantly enriched in carbon on galactic scales, even though the look-back times are considerable (the average redshift of the sample sources corresponds to an age of the universe of ~2 Gyr).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.