Paper detail

A super-Earth and a mini-Neptune around Kepler-59

We characterize the radii and masses of the star and planets in the Kepler-59 system, as well as their orbital parameters. The star parameters are determined through a standard spectroscopic analysis, resulting in a mass of $1.359\pm 0.155\,M_\odot$ and a radius of $1.367\pm 0.078\,R_\odot$. The planetary radii obtained are $1.5\pm 0.1\,R_\oplus$ for the inner and $2.2\pm 0.1\,R_\oplus$ for the outer planet. The orbital parameters and the planetary masses are determined by the inversion of Transit Timing Variations (TTV) signals. For this, we consider two different data sets, one provided by Holczer et al. 2016, with TTVs only for the planet Kepler-59c, and the other provided by Rowe et al. 2015, with TTVs signals for both planets. The inversion method is carried out by applying an algorithm of Bayesian inference (MultiNest) combined with an efficient N-body integrator (Swift). For each of the data sets, two possible solutions are found, both having the same probability according to their corresponding Bayesian evidences. All four solutions appear to be indistinguishable within their 2-$σ$ uncertainties. Nevertheless, statistical analyses show that the solutions from Rowe et al. 2015 data better characterize the data. The first and second solutions identify masses of $5_{-2}^{+4}~M_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ and $4.6_{-2.0}^{+3.6}~M_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$, and $3.0^{+0.8}_{-0.8}~M_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ and $2.6^{+1.9}_{-0.8}~M_{\mathrm{\oplus}}$ for the inner and outer planet, respectively. This points to a system with an inner super-Earth and an outer mini-Neptune. Dynamical studies show the planets have almost co-planar orbits with small eccentricities ($e<0.1$), close but not into the 3:2 mean motion resonance. Stability analysis indicates that this configuration is stable over million years of evolution.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.